Share this article

There was a gathering of negotiators from 175 countries in Ottawa to craft an international treaty addressing plastic pollution. Amidst the urgency of the crisis, tensions arise between radical environmentalists and practical industry concerns. The involvement of nations like Uganda underscores the global significance of the issue.

Negotiators from approximately 175 countries gathered in the serene surroundings of the Canadian capital, Ottawa, embarking on a crucial mission to craft an international treaty aimed at stemming the tide of plastic pollution wreaking havoc on our planet’s ecosystems. 

The urgency of their task was palpable, as this marked the fourth round of negotiations since governments, driven by irrefutable scientific evidence, committed to developing a comprehensive solution to the escalating plastic crisis.

Amidst the backdrop of bustling negotiations, radical environmentalists made their voices heard, advocating for a radical ban on plastic manufacturing. However, their impassioned pleas collided with the practical realities of the global packaging industry and industrial practices deeply intertwined with plastic production.

In a virtual media briefing that reverberated across the globe, Inger Andersen, the Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme, articulated a nuanced approach to tackling the plastic scourge.

 Her words resonated with urgency and conviction: “We will continue to need plastic for specific uses, such as renewable energy technologies. But there is growing agreement that short-lived and single-use can go.”

Andersen’s sentiment encapsulated the collective resolve to chart a path towards a more sustainable future, acknowledging the hard lessons learned from seventy years of plastic proliferation.

Marching forward with purpose, negotiators delved into three critical themes: marine plastic pollution, capacity building strategies, and financing mechanisms for sustainable solutions.

Uganda’s substantial representation underscored the global significance of these discussions, with experts like NEMA’s Executive Director, Barirega Akankwasah, lending their expertise to the dialogue.

Despite notable strides, challenges loomed large on the horizon. Deep divisions surfaced regarding the optimal approach to address the plastic crisis, pitting proponents of production curtailment against advocates for enhanced waste management. 

This clash of ideologies threatened to impede progress, echoing the complexities witnessed in debates surrounding climate change and fossil fuels.

Yet, amidst the complexities and frustrations, a glimmer of hope emerged. Jyoti Mathur-Filipp, the leader of the International Negotiating Committee on plastics, rallied participants with a clarion call for action: “We have brought the world here in Ottawa to beat plastic pollution. And we need to make these seven days count, deliver a text that is as close as possible to the final agreement that we all want to see.”

As the negotiations reached a crescendo, a sense of anticipation filled the air. The imminent transition to Busan, Republic of Korea, for the fifth session underscored the pivotal moment in history.

With over 1300 participants from 175 member countries, alongside a diverse array of environmental NGOs and UN entities, the stage was set for a historic diplomatic endeavor.

In the face of adversity, Andersen remained steadfast in her conviction: “I completely understand that there can be some frustrations. But we have to understand there has to be a world with a broad agreement to encompass everyone and everyone’s economy.”

The journey to combat plastic pollution was fraught with challenges, yet united by a common purpose, nations converged in Ottawa, laying the groundwork for a more sustainable future.